18

Results after I tested four wireless outdoor security cameras

Red Glow is feature, not bug 2

I wanted to chip in to the best security cameras review, so for this post I selected and bought four cameras that advertised useful features for a basic or introductory outdoor home security camera. These are my notes from personally testing the Wyze Outdoor Kit, Reolink RLC-410W, Ring Stick Up Cam Battery, and LaView Outdoor.

The main distinguishing features were a combination of battery vs wall power and devices that claimed internet-free functionality for use in emergencies or off-grid applications. By comparing devices from different vendors I learned a lot about what to look for and what to avoid when picking out a camera that I’ll share at the end. Head to head comparisons between the cameras also reveal a number of interesting features and unexpected considerations.

Features Comparison

All cameras tested had the advertised the following features:

  • Remote live monitoring
  • Optional notifications for motion detection
    • Laview notifications didn’t seem to work
  • Automatic IR Night vision mode
  • Wireless data transmission
  • Mounting hardware
  • Optional extra features, such as paid cloud storage

I put together this table:

Chart

“Personal Favorite” – Wyze

Wyze Outdoor Kit – $60

Wyze

The Wyze Outdoor Camera is an easy choice for a balanced range of features and is a good option for a first-time security camera user. While there are some limitations, the combination of price, features, and ease of use make this a “sane prepping” choice for many introductory applications.

Pros:

  • The small, battery powered wireless device is easy to place and largely unobtrusive.
  • The camera offers all the basic features you’d expect such as motion alerts, live view, night vision, and audio options. (Motion alert push notifications require an internet connection)
  • Additional cameras are fairly inexpensive and the base station is advertised as supporting up to four cameras each.
  • Extra features add some resilience
  • An optional micro SD card slot allows for time lapse and scheduled recordings. Micro SD cards can be put in both camera and base station.
  • Once set up the system is at least partially usable when the internet goes out.
  • The device advertises a travel mode that is designed to be internet free and connect directly to your phone/tablet/laptop when it acts as a wifi access point or with the base station (if you can power it).
  • The camera can be recharged during active use via a usb interface (should be compatible with mobile solar chargers or battery backups)

Cons:

  • The app can take some getting used to with some less intuitive user interface options. The app isn’t poorly designed, just not as intuitive as other options.
  • The app occasionally glitches, in particular manual video recording sometimes fails. Resteating micro SD card helped with this issue
  • The camera uses a magnet to attach to its base stand. This magnet is strong enough to support the camera however a stranger could easily steal the camera body.
  • The camera is best suited to near-in applications like covering entryways or close by points of interest.
  • The “motion zone” is not customizable and limited to the bottom two thirds of the image frame.
  • Raindrops that fall directly on the lens may distort the image.
  • Some advertised features are less useful, such as two way talk (this seems less applicable to most prepping scenarios though), users of indoor/wall powered Wyze products might be disappointed by comparison, but for the price/power constraints this is not a bad value product.
  • “No Internet” options are limited to travel mode and live view, can’t access stored motion event recordings without internet.

Wyze Off Grid Mobile Use

Wyze advertises a mode of use where you can operate free from the internet using your phone or another mobile device. Such a use case could appeal to some prepping scenarios while on the move though the features available are somewhat limited compared to the internet-enabled option. This feature is called “travel mode” and can work with either a single camera (without base station) and presumably could work with a base station and multiple cameras, though power for the base station must be provided.

Pairing to a single camera is straightforward and allows basic functionality such as live view, and (with the addition of a micro SD card) scheduled recording events or interactive still and video recording. Push notifications do not appear to work in travel mode. While not exclusively tested, I suspect travel mode may have battery implications (either increased demand due to acting as wifi connection, decreased demand due to motion based recording being inactive, or some combination of both). While not considered during the initial purchase, this seems to be a useful and relevant ‘added value’ feature.

Off Grid and Technology Enthusiasts – Reolink

Reolink RLC-410W – $60

reolink

The Reolink camera requires wall power but uses wifi to transmit data offering a combination of flexibility and constraints on where it is placed. Enabled by the wall power this camera has superior image quality and additional features not provided by most battery powered options. The main appeal of this Reolink is that it allows for continuous 24/7 internet-free recording, integration with third party software/hardware, and a very durable camera body and mounting base.

This camera wouldn’t be my first suggestion for many but if you’re comfortable with modest hardware/software configuration and have long distance views on your property with available power outlets (or have limited internet connectivity) this camera has a number of features you may value.

Pros:

  • The camera offers all the basic features you’d expect such as motion alerts, live view, night vision, and audio options.(Motion alert push notifications require an internet connection)
  • The Internet is not required for basic usage, data can be transmitted through a wifi network that is disconnected from the internet.
  • This camera makes use the Real Time Steaming Protocol (RTSP) allowing for third party software and hardware integration and expanded local storage options.
  • Unlike battery powered options, this allows for continuous 24/7 recording.
  • Micro SD slot allows easy local event recording through the app.

Cons:

  • While the app and camera are largely plug and play an ethernet connection to input wifi network credentials is needed for initial setup. Internet access is advised for updates, software downloads, and possible app limitations (initial setup was conducted with internet access, though it might be possible through a disconnected wifi network, push notifications for motion alerts seem to require the internet)
  • A small hex wrench was not provided for adjusting a set screw and the provided mounting philips head screws stripped but are easily replaced with higher quality wood screws
  • The included power supply does not look rugged or weather proof and should be sheltered from rain. A power extension cord and the cord connected to the camera body are higher quality, though some extra weatherproofing with electrical/duct tape is suggested for some of the connections.
  • Third party software and local storage may require a degree of computer/network skills and internet research but is not too difficult.
  • Motion detection is very sensitive by default and may require some tuning/experimentation to avoid false positive alerts without missing more meaningful events. For example IR illuminated rain drops activated motion alerts even with adjustments to default settings. Custom detection zones and sensitivity can be changed. Higher end cameras from Reolink advertise more nuanced motion detection (person/car), though I’m unclear if these are local or cloud services.
  • It might be possible to fix night-rain detection issues by choosing an overhang or other covered area to mount this camera (to avoid having illuminate rain drops directly in front of the camera lens)

“DIY Security System” – Ring

Ring Stick Up Cam Battery – $100

Ring

The Ring Stickup Cam Outdoors is an upgrade pick most appropriate for those looking to slowly build up a full security system, are willing to pay for a monthly plan, and aren’t worried about losing internet connectivity. This device unequivocally requires an active internet connection to function. Local storage options are limited to manually downloading clips from a cloud account (though it seems like a limited amount of cloud storage is provided for free, this is limited to a free 30 day trial period as it is advertised as requiring a monthly plan for download to local storage).

While not advertised it seems possible to use your phone as a mobile hotspot which would make this a mobile option so long as you have cellular internet coverage and a data allowance to spare. Due to the combination of a monthly plan (that is not well advertised and initially hidden by a free trial period) it’s hard to recommend this camera unless you plan to build a full security system around the Ring ecosystem. That being said, the quality of the features provided are fairly high. Image quality, and especially audio, are handled well. The alerts are accurate, relevant, and don’t require much change from the default settings.

Pros:

  • Default motion alert settings are most accurate for relevant motion events
  • Easy to mount
  • Clear audio filters out background noise (wind and distant road noise)
  • Community alerts are useful for situational awareness if other Ring users are nearby

Cons:

  • Monthly service fee required for upgrade and storage options
  • No free local long term storage options
  • Mounting hardware is not rugged
  • Internet is required for all functional usage
  • 30 “free trial” masks limitations of app usage without a subscription

Not Worth the Time/Money

LaView Security Camera Outdoor – $50

Laview

There is a lot not to like about this Laview camera. Initial setup is not intuitive, online documentation is very poor, the app is very limited and designed exclusively for use on a phone. The app requests access to more privacy features than is reasonably required (bluetooth, location, microphone). The camera requires an internet connection for basic usage without providing any compelling cloud features that add value. The camera frame is made of cheap-feeling plastic and poorly designed, requiring a phillips-head driver-bit in a socket wrench or flexible driver to install properly. The pan/tilt functionality is nice, but not unique to this product family. The sound quality is no better, and often worse, than battery powered options. Image quality is not bad when exporting images however the phone-app size limits the utility of the camera in most use cases. Wall-power is provided through a USB cord which makes no sense.

Pros:

  • Pan/Tilt remote control
  • Automatic object tracking option for pan/tilt

Cons:

  • Internet required for all relevant feature usage
  • Poor app design and quality
  • Counter-intuitive setup process
  • Features are unreliable, difficult to enable, or non-existent

Image Quality Comparison

WyzeDayNight

Wyze Image quality is not the highest in terms of resolution or contrast.  The ‘washed out’ effect on some types of features in the night vision is not ideal.  Regardless, the overall features and ease of use still make this a worthy pick for many use cases.

ReolinkDayNight

Reolink has the best image quality and lowest lense distortion of all cameras tested.  The lack of ‘fish eye’ type lens distortions improves image quality but does restrict view.  As a result this camera option is better suited to long views such as a long driveway.  Note the superior image contrast and detail for both day and night images.

RingDayNight

The Ring camera suffers from a lack of native app support for export.  As a result the images above were captured as “screen captures” from an iPad in a landscape layout.   Resolution and detail artifacts may be partially a result of this capture method however they are representative of the detail visible in the app window. Lens distortion is highest for this camera which improves peripheral view at the expense of image accuracy.

laViewDayNight

While the Laview day image has crisper detail and contrast, the night vision image is very washed out by comparison.  While the app supports saving images at higher detail than other options the app is also forced into a phone-format window making active monitoring more difficult.  

Notes on Wifi Data Range

Three of the four cameras tested relied exclusively on 2.4 Ghz wifi, while Wyze uses an ethernet cord to connect a base station with its own radio for data.  Effective range of radio/wifi signals for data is limited by a number of factors including the design/type of antenna on the camera/base station and router as well as obstacles and their material (metal blocks radio frequencies more effectively than wood or brick).

Data range was not tested for the wall powered cameras as my exterior power options are limited so instead I used the battery powered cameras and a cell phone with cellular data turned off to estimate the effective range for my setup.  Router placement also matters, as line of sight improves signal strength.

All cameras were able to transmit data from the second floor to the basement without issue (the main obstacles being wood and drywall).  Similarly all cameras functioned without issue in the common testing placement approximately 20 feet from the wifi router with a single brick wall as an obstruction.  With a single brick wall as obstruction, the Wyze camera functioned without noticeable dropped frames up to approximately 60 feet with performance rapidly falling off within ten additional feet.  Ring performed somewhat better with acceptable performance through a single brick wall up to about 80 feet.

I tested the range on the other side of my house, which introduced additional interior walls and a single brick wall as obstructions.  Of note, both battery powered cameras suffered in the immediate vicinity of my front (metal) door.  Further out on this side of the house the range for both cameras suffered noticeable and were completely unusable at a distance of about 40-50 feet from the router.  The additional obstructions, including partial blockage from a metal door likely contributed to poor performance on this side of the house.

Theoretically, range could be improved by using wifi repeaters or moving the wifi router closer to the desired coverage area.  As a point of reference, my iPhone 8, with cellular data turned off relying solely on wifi, achieved similar performance which leads me to assume this has more to do with limits on wifi data transmission than hardware differences of the devices.

Battery Life

Battery life will depend on usage/activity, and the sensitivity of motion detection areas.  The Ring camera has a physically larger battery and lost a smaller percentage of its total battery life over the course of testing.  Both battery powered devices experienced nearly identical motion exposure, though their activation thresholds were slightly different with Ring also being more likely to register a relevant motion event.  Both cameras were used in a low activity area for several weeks of testing which likely improved their battery endurance.  Testing occurred for approximately 7 weeks starting with full charges.  Wyze battery life went down to 55% compared to 88% for Ring.  Both performed largely as expected in terms of battery life.

A Word of Caution:

When selecting a modern security camera you are picking not only the hardware but also its related software and services, both paid and unpaid (if an internet connection is required then the odds are high that a remote server is also being used/maintained, even if you aren’t paying for it directly).  

Like any other programmable device, software and standards can change.  Ideally these will change for the better but updates can also result in reduced functionality.  This is in part why devices that do not depend on the internet have an intrinsic appeal for some, if you isolate a device it will remain static and should work short of a hardware failure or existing software defect.  If a program defect is found you can weigh the options of updating the software on your own terms.  

The same can not be said of service/internet dependent devices. Internet/service dependent devices often require you to periodically perform an update to continue using the device. There is also a phenomenon with “smart” appliances where once support by the parent company is withdrawn the devices are either useless or severely degraded, regardless relying on a company to keep its servers running adds yet another layer that can cause a failure.  

What to look for in a Security Camera Company/Product

When researching a security camera for purchase I learned some information that might help you in researching alternatives that suit your needs better.

Look for reliable companies:

  • Read the worst reviews first.  Every product will suffer some amount of negative feedback from a customer who doesn’t like something, but well written negative reviews can point you towards pitfalls quickly.  Unfortunately sometimes the reviews come in late, one informative negative review for the Laview camera was written after the purchase was initiated.  Keep in mind, some negative reviews might be from user error or a low frequency defect.
  • Can you download user manuals and software from the company website? Try to read the fine print first.  Don’t settle for vague or ambiguous documentation, you should see matching model numbers and ideally either publishing or copyright dates somewhere.  For example, I found a Laview user manual for a “wifi camera” that seemed to have the features I was after but this was a generic manual that did not apply to the model I selected.  Worse still, I couldn’t actually find a user manual online for the model I selected, I had to see the paper copy to realize it wasn’t available online.  Had I known to look closer this would have been a huge red flag.
  • Look for active user forums with responses from the company.  During my research I encountered informative threads from both Wyze and Reolink forums that addressed features I was curious about.  The forum activity and the company responses helped me set expectations.  Even if the responses aren’t satisfactory, an active forum with even vague responses can give you insight into how transparent the company is.

Look for key features:

  • Learn the keywords to search for.  Before I made any selection I kept using search terms like “no internet” or “internet free” or “offline use.”  This did turn up a few promising leads but for network cameras “RTSP” or Real Time Streaming Protocol is a lot more specific as a search term. Once I learned about this term it helped me find new candidates that escaped my first round of research.  Unfortunately I had to acquire a camera with this particular standard before I learned of its existence so there is a “chicken and the egg” problem with this method of research.
  • Download the apps and see how far you can get before buying the hardware.  Privacy notices and feature limitations might sway your opinion.
  • Look for third party or add-on features.  Third party interoperability will require some degree of openness that will hint at how flexible the product is.
13

  • Comments (13)

    • 5

      Great review! Thank you for taking the time to share your experience with us. 

      Can I ask why you chose the Wyze over the Raolink? Video quality is the number one thing that I look for when buying a camera, be it dash cam for my car, or video camera for home videos. The Raolink looked like the quality was much clearer. 

      I also like that the Raolink has PC support, and a little rain cover over the lens.

      Just from your review, I think I would want to go with the Raolink. A bit harder to set up than the Wyze, but superior in other categories.

      • 6

        I choose Wyze over Reolink for a very simple personal reason:  I don’t have a lot of outdoor power outlets and I don’t have a large yard to cover.  If I had a bigger house/yard, I’d probably go with Reolink out of these four.  Its also the first (only?) battery powered camera that will still do its basic job without an internet connection that I’ve seen which was my own personal goal.  If Wyze required internet all the time, I’d have picked Reolink without any regrets.

        For this post I was also thinking of the average/intro-level user and Wyze was slightly more user friendly out of the box

        Let me say, I really liked the Reolink camera.  My only real problem with it was that when it rained at night, based on my placement, the notifications and event recording went a little crazy.  I think you can probably get around this with third party software but thats not ‘out of the box.’  To give you an idea of what I mean about “crazy notifications” after a night of heavy rain I work up to this on my phone (I’d need to review hours of video to see if a person was actually recorded):

        When it rains it pours

      • 5

        Yikes! That is really bad, and would be a deal breaker for me if I couldn’t get that figured out.

        Having so many motion alerts will desensitize you from getting notifications which will be so detrimental when someone really is lurking outside of your house.

      • 4

        Part of the issue is that since the camera and IR illumination are so good, rain drops (and sometimes bugs) that fly right in front of the lens are really obvious and set off an alert.  Honestly, I wouldn’t be surprised if some of the lower quality sensors just ‘didn’t notice’ things like rain rather than being specifically tuned to ignore them (either is possible, really).  Its a weird trade space.  Some of their products advertise “Smart Person/Vehicle Detection” which wasn’t on my radar at first so I didn’t think to look for it, can’t speak to how well it works or if its a service or baked into the hardware.

        On the topic of “relevance” I might not have explained 100% clear – Ring won that category (I suspect part of their “cloud plan” is some cloud based processing which is why you need a subscription to store events?).  Things like animals (stray cats, raccoons, deer, depending on your local fauna) are things to keep in mind too.  You can also partially mitigate this with camera placement – if you have a multi camera system one that points at your door and another that points towards a street with cars/pedestrian traffic – and you can choose to only enable push notifications for close in areas like your front door.  That is also part of the appeal of custom motion detection zones – but if a cat or a bug is in your motion zone it may still fire off an event.

    • 4

      Great review! I’ll have to look at getting some of these for my house this year. 

      Is there a particular model that you would go for if you had to do your entire house? Which one do you think would work good on the large scale of like 5-8 cameras? 

      • 5

        because there are so many factors that are often personal/unique to each situation its hard to give specific advice.  I ask this more rhetorically (it will ultimately be up to you to determine what is best for your unique situation):  What’s your budget, what are your primary concerns/use cases, and what are your biggest operating constraints (power, Internet reliability)?

        If money was of no concern and you were willing to make modifications to run wires around your house (which includes any patching of walls to make things look neat) I’d personally look into a Reolink POE (power over ethernet) system with custom storage and third party software upgrades.  That could easily set you back thousands of dollars though.

        If you’ve never had a security camera system before and want maximum flexibility for minimum price without compromising on too much, you could get a 4-camera Wyze system for around 200$ (you could upgrade that to 5-8 cameras with another base station or supplement with other Wyze products).

        If you want more of a traditional security system (which traditional monthly costs) a Ring system with a subscription upgrade to their “Plus” tier that included 24/7 alarm monitoring might be appealing (at least if you have high internet reliability).

        I choose Wyze for myself because it seemed like a balanced “starter set.” 

      • 3

        Those are some good points. I’ll have to think what I want to do.

        In my dream world, I would have all the cameras hard wired to my own server in my house and record to some large hard drives, and have the ability to login to that server using my own encrypted connection to monitor if I’m out of the house. But that all will sure cost quite a bit.

        Might just end up with the Wyze system for around $200. Looks much easier and much much cheaper.

        Thanks again for your review and advice. 

    • 3

      Great review. Exactly what I was looking for. I have a 3 year-old Amcrest wired 4k system that is not high enough res to capture license plates (I have them in a flowerpot at the end of the drive. We have a delightful opioid house down the street).

      I see Reolink has a new 5MP version with SD card:
      https://www.amazon.com/Wireless-Security-Autofocus-Waterproof-RLC-511W-dp-B07GXG3ZXJ/dp/B07GXG3ZXJ/ref=dp_ob_title_c

      I just ordered the new Reolink to test. Will report back. Hopefully it uses the same (buried) power cable as the Amcrest ones (looks like it).

      POST-DISASTER NO WIFI USAGE
      I assume this is why the author of this post is looking for a wifi-free camera? This new Reolink also includes a “Network cable” that might fit onto my existing (buried) data cable, which would be great. If that does not work, then I expect that the SD card would at least record enough data that I could retrieve and review after an incident. It wouldn’t be real-time (without wifi) but at least would be something.

      • 3

        Re: “I assume this is why the author of this post is looking for a wifi-free camera?”

        minor clarification – I’m actually OK with wifi, its more the reliance on the internet (as long as you have power your wifi should still let you make connections to devices on your local network – you might not be able to monitor remotely, but you should be able to use it at home).

        The concern for cameras that require an internet connection under all use scenarios is that if there is a prolonged internet outage (either post disaster or just a cable getting cut) you’re out of luck.  Also the models that require internet to operate all all likely rely n a remote server being maintained which you have no control over – offers another unnecessary point of failure.

        I’d be curious to hear any updates once you’ve had a chance to set it up.  

      • 1

        I personally am not a fan of wifi cameras. I don’t need this happening to me.

      • 3

        I don’t claim to be an internet security expert, but keep in mind wifi is just a mechanism to transmit data wirelessly.  Yes, wifi can be hacked remotely, but typically they’re going to have to be within a few hundred feet (if not less) to be in range of your router’s wifi radio.  If more than a few hundred feet away they have to really have it out for you personally, with specialized equipment and amplifiers, pointing a directional antenna at your home (I *think* happy to learn more from someone with a deeper background!!!).

        Every internet connected device (including the one you’re using right now to read this) is theoretically “hackable” but there are various layers of defense.  Most reputable home/commercial routers (including wifi, if you have more than one device on the internet for a single home internet connection, you have a router) have a basic firewall and port access rules that prevent most normal/”easy” attacks/hacks (unless you open them up, hopefully you don’t do that unless you know what you’re doing).  Internet apps and hardware (yes, including security cameras) can run software that might open less obvious ‘holes’ in your home networks defenses.  One way to mitigate this is to go with a reliable vendor that has a vested interest in not losing customers with sloppy code.

        Another way to avoid this is to keep your [security network] “air-gapped” (which can also be a bit of a misnomer when talking about wifi…) or otherwise not connected to the internet.  This is an additional reason why I went looking for cameras that specifically did not require the internet to function, for those who have this as an added security concern.  If you keep a camera off the internet, it can’t be hacked by the internet (but you also can’t use it remotely…).

        To give an example – my home network includes a cable modem which connects me to the internet.  This modem only supports a single network connection via ethernet cord (hard wire).  Since I have multiple devices at home that need to connect (including laptops, cell phones, and tablets that connect wirelessly) I have my cable modem connected by ethernet cord to a wifi-enable router (which also supports additional hard wired connections).  Since I also don’t have a home with ethernet cords in the walls, wifi is needed if I want internet in more than one room.

        If I had an internet enabled camera that used a hard wire plugged into my home’s router, it would be just as vulnerable to any threat more than a few hundred feet or line of sight to my home via an internet attack.  A technically more secure option would be a hard wired camera system on an air gapped local area network (or an old school CCTV running on coax?) but thats more than you’re average consumer is going to do without going fairly high end and outside the budget range I had for this topic.

        Yes, wifi is technically less secure, but the greater threat is from poor internet security.  Also, it seems like maybe ADT doesn’t have the best safe guards in place to avoid abuse (thats independent of wifi/internet security).  (not trying to lecture or anything! just wanting to put good information out there, happy to be corrected by security experts with a formal background!)

      • 2

        Thanks for the great explanation about the true threat of wifi attacks. I need to learn more about networking and how to do it properly. Once I understand it, I think i’ll be more open to getting some of the cameras like the ones you reviewed above. 

        I realize now that my comment above really is not accurate as the wifi cameras you reviewed are not the same as a service like ADT that monitors your account and has access to your feed.  I should have phrased that better.