7

About that IFAK tourniquet

Does your kit have one? I’m a bit mystified by the emphasis on this piece of equipment, perhaps because neither firearms nor big hikes are part of my life. My Red Cross and NOLS courses haven’t emphasized a tourniquet — even kind of discouraged it. But the perfectionist in me is conflicted. Why should a suburbanite like me consider investing in a tourniquet?

11

  • Best Replies

  • Comments (11)

    • 3

      No medical background, but I imagine its along the lines of “better to have it and not need it, then need it and not have it” and because limb injuries might become more common in survival scenarios.  If you’re copping wood with an axe, miss, and take a big chunk out of your foot/leg – my semi-informed understanding is this might be a valid use for a tourniquet.  Even if you end up losing a limb because you wait too long, at least you’re still alive?

      If you’re near a hospital/have 911 service, thats probably better.  But if you’re chopping wood because the utilities are down and thats how your heating you home, and you can’t call 911, it might be a good use case.  This applies to other tools, self defense, or if you suddenly find you *have* to start hiking because you’re fleeing your home and have no choice, and have a bad fall, those are other scenarios.

      That said, I don’t have one (yet).  When I add an axe/hatchet to my tools though, I’ll probably consider it more seriously.

      • 4

        Thanks. I have to smile at the idea of the axe and tourniquet in the same shopping basket. 😉

    • 5

      Speaking from an extensive background in wilderness SAR experience, i would say there is nothing wrong with having a tourniquet (it is yet another dressing), but you are unlikely to need it.  We often encountered significant bleeding, all of which were controlled by direct or indirect pressure.  Treating or being on scene in more than 400 operations in wildlands, we never applied a tourniquet.  Much more likely when chainsaws, industrial machinery, etc. come into play.

      We did deal extensively with broken, or possibly broken limbs, and possible spinal and cervical injuries.  You are more likely to require a backboard than a tourniquet to properly evacuate a victim…

      • 3

        Thank you for bringing all that experience to this question. Really helpful!

    • 5

      Tourniquets are no longer a “last resort” option and have a number of uses.  Their primary purpose is to buy you time until you can control bleeding with well-aimed direct pressure–though in some cases you might be unable to get that in which case the tourniquet stays on.  The mindset about tourniquet removal has definitely changed though.

      A use case for a tourniquet might be that you put one on as a hasty intervention to stop bleeding until you can get to a safer location.  We have also used them during wound cleaning on extremities–it keeps the wound clear of blood and numbs the limb (wound cleaning can be an “uncomfortable” process)–they are used in surgery specifically to keep the surgery site clear of blood.

      It is one piece of equipment that can significantly change the outcome of an injury and one that is challenging to improvise correctly.  Plenty of science backs up the efficacy of quality commercial tourniquets.  Good training helps you know when to apply it.

      • 3

        Cheri,

        I completely understand your skepticism, but I’ll echo Tom’s comments above (and add that I am not a medical professional).

        Back in the dark ages when I was in Boy Scouts, we had it drilled into our heads that you never, ever applied a tourniquet unless it was an absolute life-or-death situation. So you can imagine my surprise when I was taught how to use a tourniquet at a CPR course I took last year at the local hospital! They encouraged us to use it in cases of severe bleeding on extremities where direct pressure isn’t working (or it is, but you’re running out of hands) and when it’s possible to get the victim to proper care reasonably soon.

        I questioned the nurse teaching the class specifically about this “new” philosophy, and she reiterated that a tourniquet is now considered a useful tool that does not cause permanent damage when used properly. (She then told the class of a soldier in Afghanistan who had to wear a tourniquet for 48 hours, but did not suffer any permanent nerve damage.) She worked in the emergency room, and strongly recommended that everyone carry a tourniquet in their car because a car accident could easily be a situation where the tourniquet could be useful.

        If you’re interested, the “Stop the Bleed” course (stopthebleed.org) teaches how to use a tourniquet properly.

        -WS

      • 3

        Thanks! I’ll check out Stop the Bleed.

      • 3

        Tom (who is an emergency medicine instructor) and the CEO of Stop The Bleed put together this free lesson: https://theprepared.com/survival-skills/guides/tourniquet/

      • 2

        Great! John, any chance we can get a Like button? Or am I just missing it? 😉

    • 3

      I have RC first aid,  Wilderness FA, CERT and done Stop the Bleed twice.  I have a couple of North American Rescue (the gold standard) Cat 5 tourniquet.   I keep one in my office drawer trauma FAK for  active shooter situations  and another in my vehicle’s trauma kit in case I come across a car accident.

      Do I think that ‘everyone’ should have one? Not necessarily. But, workplace violence is a thing and I work in a building that could be a target of terrorism or other violence, so I have a trauma related kit on hand.

      • 3

        Makes an awful kind of sense. Thanks.