You are repeating a fallacy that this article clearly points out
Again you fail to include the probable deaths. Confirmed deaths: 12,287 Probable deaths: 5,302
Confirmed deaths: 12,287 Probable deaths: 5,302 Is todays actual data you will note that the PDF you link to only refers to confirmed cases.
Confirmed deaths: 12,287 Probable deaths: 5,302
You should use a range 0.148% to 0.21% As of today. Confirmed deaths: 12,287 Probable deaths: 5,302
Sweden did implement voluntary social distancing (which for most part is being adhered to) and most who can work from home are as part of that. So of course this mitigation factor will and has impacted the growth rate. Then you go do a stupid thing like taking their population and deaths to compute a death rate. IFR is the main one we care about of those infected how many died. CFR is rate based on number of cases. Rarely does anyone calculate total population and use deaths to determine mortality rate as that is absurd in middle of a pandemic when likely 80% or higher have not even been infected yet.